plaintiff: - MO YUK PING defendant: - HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION jurisdiction_code: HKCFA jurisdiction_name: Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region case_location: - 香港特別行政區 - Hong Kong Special Administrative Region case_reason: >- Applicant seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against her convictions for conspiracy to defraud and perverting the course of justice (CACC 26/2006). case_object: - criminal conviction - constitutional right to legal certainty - liberty judgment_result: - charge: Application for leave to appeal against conviction for conspiracy to defraud (Charge 2) (liability issue) result: Allowed. The Court granted leave to appeal limited to the certified point regarding whether the elements of the offence of conspiracy to defraud are sufficiently precise to satisfy the constitutional requirement of legal certainty. - charge: Application for leave to appeal against conviction for conspiracy to pervert the course of public justice (Charge 3) (liability issue) result: Dismissed. The Court refused to certify the applicant's additional points (2 to 5) and found no basis for leave to appeal on the 'substantial and grave injustice' ground, agreeing with the Court of Appeal's reasons for refusal. judgment_summary: >- Applicant Mo Yuk Ping sought leave to appeal convictions for conspiracy to defraud and perverting justice. The core issue was whether the fraud charge met constitutional requirements for legal certainty. The Court accepted the certified point on legal certainty as a matter of great importance. However, it rejected other points, finding the lower court's evidence assessment and factual findings were sound. Leave to appeal was granted only for the certified point on Charge 2. involved_entities: - entity_name: Mo Yuk Ping reason: The Applicant in this case, seeking leave to appeal against convictions for conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to pervert the course of public justice. - entity_name: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region reason: The Respondent in this case, representing the prosecution. - entity_name: Chief Justice Li reason: Member of the Appeal Committee presiding over the application for leave to appeal. - entity_name: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ reason: Member of the Appeal Committee and the judge who delivered the determination in this case. - entity_name: Mr Justice Chan PJ reason: Member of the Appeal Committee presiding over the application for leave to appeal. - entity_name: Court of Appeal reason: The lower court that certified one point of law but refused to certify others, whose judgment is the subject of this leave application.