plaintiff: - HKSAR defendant: - HO CHUNG YI HENRY - WONG PAK LAM - HIEN LEE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED case_reason: Criminal prosecution involving multiple defendants in Kowloon City Magistrates' Courts. The case involved technical evidence regarding PR (Proctor Ratio) and LDR (Load Deflection Ratio) test results, with normal ranges being LDR of 2 or more and PR within 0.15 to 0.2. judgment_summary: The Kowloon City Magistrates' Courts heard six consolidated cases (KCS 4906-4911/2013) presided over by Chief Magistrate Mr Clement Lee. The trial took place over 23 days from 27 November to 17 December 2013 (15 days) and 10 to 17, 20 February 2014 (8 days). The verdict was delivered on 9 April 2014, with corrigenda issued on 11 April 2014. The corrigenda corrected technical details regarding normal test result ranges for PR and LDR, and corrected the spelling of counsel's name from "Tony Jenkyn-Jones" to "Toby Jenkyn-Jones". The case involved analysis of test samples, with particular attention to sample no. S3 which had PR figures close to the normal range of 0.2. jurisdiction_code: HKMAGC jurisdiction_name: Kowloon City Magistrates' Courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region case_location: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region case_object: - Criminal prosecution - Technical evidence analysis (PR and LDR test results) - Engineering-related offences judgment_result: - charge: Criminal charges against multiple defendants (specific charges not detailed in excerpt) result: Verdict delivered on 9 April 2014 (specific outcome not detailed in excerpt) involved_entities: - entity_name: Chief Magistrate Mr Clement Lee reason: Presiding magistrate who heard the case and delivered the verdict - entity_name: Jenny Cheng reason: Clerk to Chief Magistrate who issued the corrigenda - entity_name: Mr Toby Jenkyn-Jones reason: Legal counsel representing one of the parties in the case - entity_name: PW8 reason: Prosecution witness who provided expert testimony on PR and LDR test results - entity_name: Hien Lee Engineering Company Limited reason: Corporate defendant in the criminal proceedings