plaintiff:
- Competition Commission
defendant:
- FUNGS E&M ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (馮氏機電工程有限公司)
- YEE HING METAL SHOP (義興鐵器土木油漆工程)
- CHEUNG MIN (張棉) trading as ACCORD CONSTRUCTION & DECORATION CO (雅閣建築裝修工程公司)
- HING SHING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (興盛建築公司)
- LUEN HOP DECORATION ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (聯合裝飾工程有限公司)
- DAO KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED (陶記營造廠有限公司)
- WONG WAI CHUEN (黃偉銓)
- WONG FU SAN (黃富新)
- CHEUNG YUN KAM (張潤錦)
jurisdiction_code: HKCT
jurisdiction_name: 香港特別行政區競爭事務審裁處
case_location:
- 香港特別行政區
case_reason: >-
  Competition Commission challenges the enforcement action regarding anti-competitive practices by FUN
case_object:
- anti-competitive practices
judgment_result:
- charge: 1st Respondent FUNGS E&M ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (馮氏機電工程有限公司) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 1st Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 2nd Respondent YEE HING METAL SHOP (義興鐵器土木油漆工程) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 2nd Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 3rd Respondent CHEUNG MIN (張棉) trading as ACCORD CONSTRUCTION & DECORATION CO (雅閣建築裝修工程公司) liability
    issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 3rd Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 4th Respondent HING SHING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (興盛建築公司) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 4th Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 5th Respondent LUEN HOP DECORATION ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED (聯合裝飾工程有限公司) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 5th Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 6th Respondent DAO KEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED (陶記營造廠有限公司) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 6th Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 7th Respondent WONG WAI CHUEN (黃偉銓) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 7th Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 8th Respondent WONG FU SAN (黃富新) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 8th Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
- charge: 9th Respondent CHEUNG YUN KAM (張潤錦) liability issue
  result: Allowed. The Tribunal found that the 9th Respondent had engaged in anti-competitive conduct
    as alleged by the Applicant, based on evidence presented during the hearing.
judgment_summary: "In the case of Competition Commission v FUNGS E&M Engineering Company Limited et al.,\
  \ the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Competition Tribunal found that all nine respondents,\
  \ including FUNGS E&M Engineering Company Limited and others, engaged in anti-competitive practices\
  \ as alleged by the "
involved_entities:
- entity_name: Competitive Commission
  reason: Applicant in the case.
- entity_name: FUNGS E&M Engineering Company Limited (馮氏機電工程有限公司)
  reason: 1st Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: Yee Hing Metal Shop (義興鐵器土木油漆工程)
  reason: 2nd Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: CHEUNG MIN trading as ACCORD Construction & Decoration Co (張棉) (雅閣建築裝修工程公司)
  reason: 3rd Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: HING SHING Construction Company (興盛建築公司)
  reason: 4th Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: LUEN HOP Decoration Engineering Company Limited (聯合裝飾工程有限公司)
  reason: 5th Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: DAO KEE Construction Company Limited (陶記營造廠有限公司)
  reason: 6th Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: WONG WAI CHUEN (黃偉銓)
  reason: 7th Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: WONG FU SAN (黃富新)
  reason: 8th Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: CHEUNG YUN KAM (張潤錦)
  reason: 9th Respondent in the case.
- entity_name: 副主任法官歐陽桂如
  reason: Presiding judge of the case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.