plaintiff:
- CLP POWER HONG KONG LIMITED
defendant:
- COMMISSIONER OF RATING AND VALUATION
jurisdiction_code: HKLT
jurisdiction_name: Lands Tribunal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
case_location:
- 香港特別行政區
- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
case_reason: >-
  Applicant challenges the respondent's decision on case management, specifically regarding the inclusion
  of additional years in the appeal and potential refunds, seeking reconsideration of the 3rd Nov.
case_object:
- reconsideration of case management decision
judgment_result:
- charge: Review application to reconsider decision on staying appeals (liability issue)
  result: Denied. The judge found no good and cogent reasons to revisit the decision made on November
    3, 2008, regarding the test appeal procedure as a preferred option for resolving the matters efficiently.
judgment_summary: >-
  CLP POWER HONG KONG LIMITED challenged the Commissioner of Rating and Valuation's decision on case management,
  specifically regarding the inclusion of additional years in the appeal and potential refunds. The Lands
  Tribunal denied the review application, finding no good reasons to revisit the November 3, 2008, decision
  that a single test appeal should be chosen while others remain stayed. Key legal analysis focused on
  section 11A of the Lands Tribunal Ordinance, emphasizing the two-stage process
involved_entities:
- entity_name: Hon Lam J
  reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
- entity_name: Mr Richard Wilmot
  reason: Counsel/barrister representing CLP POWER HONG KONG LIMITED (Applicant)
- entity_name: Messrs Holman Fenwick Willan
  reason: Law firm instructing Mr Richard Wilmot
- entity_name: Mr Bernard Man
  reason: Counsel/barrister representing the Commissioner of Rating and Valuation (Respondent)
- entity_name: Department of Justice
  reason: Government department instructing Mr Bernard Man