51 lines
2.5 KiB
YAML
51 lines
2.5 KiB
YAML
plaintiff:
|
|
- HKSAR
|
|
defendant:
|
|
- KWOK WING KIN (郭永健) (D1)
|
|
- HO STANLEY WAI HONG (何偉航) (D2)
|
|
- WONG HO MING RAPHAEL (黃浩銘) (D3)
|
|
- TSANG KIN SHING (曾健成) (D4)
|
|
- MAK TAK CHING (麥德正) (D5)
|
|
- NG MAN YUEN AVERY (吳文遠) (D6)
|
|
- LEE CHEUK YAN (李卓人) (D7)
|
|
- LEUNG KWOK HUNG (梁國雄) (D8)
|
|
jurisdiction_code: HKCFA
|
|
jurisdiction_name: Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
|
case_location:
|
|
- 香港特別行政區
|
|
- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
|
case_reason: >-
|
|
HKSAR seeks to refuse leave for Kwok Wing Kin and others to appeal from HCMA No. 187 of 2021 regarding
|
|
the interpretation and application of the Regulation on Mandatory Quarantine Measures.
|
|
case_object:
|
|
- leave to appeal
|
|
judgment_result:
|
|
- charge: Leave to appeal for certification and leave (liability issue)
|
|
result: Refused. The court found that there is no prospect of showing a point of law of great and general
|
|
importance, as the regulation has expired and its provisions are no longer relevant or important.
|
|
judgment_summary: >-
|
|
The Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region refused HKSAR's application
|
|
for leave to appeal from HCMA No. 187 of 2021, regarding the interpretation and application of the Regulation
|
|
on Mandatory Quarantine Measures. The court found no prospect of showing a point of law of great and
|
|
general importance as the regulation had expired and its provisions were no longer relevant or important.
|
|
involved_entities:
|
|
- entity_name: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ
|
|
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
|
- entity_name: Mr Justice Lam PJ
|
|
reason: Judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
|
- entity_name: Robert Tang NPJ
|
|
reason: Judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
|
- entity_name: Mr Anson Wong Yu Yat
|
|
reason: Counsel representing the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 7th Appellants (Applicants).
|
|
- entity_name: Mr Jason Kung
|
|
reason: Counsel representing the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 7th Appellants (Applicants).
|
|
- entity_name: JCC Cheung & Co. Solicitors
|
|
reason: Law firm that instructed Mr Anson Wong Yu Yat and Mr Jason Kung for the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 7th
|
|
Appellants (Applicants).
|
|
- entity_name: Mr Andrew Li
|
|
reason: Counsel representing the Respondent.
|
|
- entity_name: Mr Christopher Fung
|
|
reason: Counsel representing the Respondent.
|
|
- entity_name: Department of Justice
|
|
reason: Government department that instructed Mr Andrew Li and Mr Christopher Fung for the Respondent.
|