45 lines
2.4 KiB
YAML
45 lines
2.4 KiB
YAML
plaintiff:
|
|
- CHENG KWOK WAH (鄭國華)
|
|
- LAI AH LOI (黎亞來)
|
|
- LIU FAT HOI (廖發開)
|
|
- HO CHING HOI (何清海)
|
|
- HSU CHE CHEONG (徐志中)
|
|
|
|
defendant:
|
|
- LI HING CLEANING SERVICES CO. LIMITED (利興清潔服務有限公司)
|
|
|
|
case_reason: Claims for severance payments and terminal payments by five claimants (3rd, 4th, 7th, 9th, and 11th Claimants) against their employer under the Labour Tribunal Ordinance.
|
|
|
|
judgment_summary: The Labour Tribunal heard claims from five claimants seeking severance payments and terminal payments from their employer. After trial hearings held between March and June 2012, the Presiding Officer ruled on 13 July 2012 that the claims for severance payments were allowed, awarding amounts ranging from HK$3,003.42 to HK$21,848 to the five claimants, totaling HK$66,918.15. The claims for terminal payments were dismissed. The Defendant applied for review on 6 August 2012, but the application was rejected as no new grounds were presented beyond those already considered and rejected at trial. The Defendant's application for stay of payment-out of the judgment sum was also dismissed, considering the senescent claimants' circumstances and the low prospect of appeal success.
|
|
|
|
jurisdiction_code: HKLAT
|
|
|
|
jurisdiction_name: Labour Tribunal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
|
|
|
case_location: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
|
|
|
case_object:
|
|
- Severance payments
|
|
- Terminal payments
|
|
- Employment rights under Labour Tribunal Ordinance
|
|
|
|
judgment_result:
|
|
- charge: Claims for severance payments
|
|
result: Allowed - HK$13,412.05 to 3rd Claimant, HK$3,003.42 to 4th Claimant, HK$21,848 to 7th Claimant, HK$13,827.86 to 9th Claimant, HK$13,826.82 to 11th Claimant
|
|
- charge: Claims for terminal payments
|
|
result: Dismissed
|
|
- charge: Defendant's application for review
|
|
result: Rejected
|
|
- charge: Defendant's application for stay of payment-out
|
|
result: Dismissed
|
|
|
|
involved_entities:
|
|
- entity_name: Michelle Lam
|
|
reason: Presiding Officer who heard the case and rendered the decision on review
|
|
- entity_name: Edmund Cham
|
|
reason: Solicitor who vetted the judgment translation
|
|
- entity_name: Judgment Translation Unit of the Judiciary
|
|
reason: Translated the judgment
|
|
- entity_name: Labour Tribunal Ordinance (Cap 25)
|
|
reason: Legislative framework under which the claims were brought and interest calculated under section 39(3)
|