52 lines
2.6 KiB
YAML
52 lines
2.6 KiB
YAML
plaintiff:
|
||
- HKSAR
|
||
defendant:
|
||
- MAK KWONG YIU (麥光耀) (D1)
|
||
- CHAN LAI YEE (陳麗兒) (D2)
|
||
- WONG SHUK ON (黃淑安) (D3)
|
||
- LEE YICK MING (李易明) (D4)
|
||
jurisdiction_code: HKCFA
|
||
jurisdiction_name: Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
||
case_location:
|
||
- 香港特別行政區
|
||
- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
||
case_reason: >-
|
||
HKSAR appeals against the Court of Appeal's decision restoring the convictions of defendants in a conspiracy
|
||
charge related to concealing CISL’s role as placing agent for CFHL, challenging the Court's
|
||
case_object:
|
||
- convictions
|
||
judgment_result:
|
||
- charge: Conspiracy charges (liability issue)
|
||
result: Allowed. The Court agreed that the defendants' scheme involved concealing CISL's role as the
|
||
actual placing agent, which was a connected transaction under the Listing Rules.
|
||
- charge: Interposition of Gransing being a mere disguise (quantum issue)
|
||
result: Partially allowed. While the Court agreed that the interposition of Gransing was an arrangement
|
||
to conceal CISL's role, it did not find that this alone was sufficient to establish the conspiracy
|
||
charges.
|
||
judgment_summary: >-
|
||
The case involves HKSAR appealing against convictions for conspiracy charges related to concealing CISL's
|
||
role in a placing agent transaction. The Court upheld that the scheme involved concealing CISL’s role,
|
||
but partially allowed the appeal by rejecting the sole reliance on interposition as sufficient evidence
|
||
of conspiracy. Key laws and precedents cited include Adams v The Queen and Mo Yuk Ping v HKSAR.
|
||
involved_entities:
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ
|
||
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Justice Fok PJ
|
||
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Justice Lam PJ
|
||
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Justice Stock NPJ
|
||
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: Sir William Young NPJ
|
||
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: HKSAR (Appellant)
|
||
reason: Government department involved as the appellant in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: MAK KWONG YIU (麥光耀) (D1)
|
||
reason: Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: CHAN LAI YEE (陳麗兒) (D2)
|
||
reason: Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: WONG SHUK ON (黃淑安) (D3)
|
||
reason: Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: LEE YICK MING (李易明) (D4)
|
||
reason: Respondent in the case.
|