60 lines
3.2 KiB
YAML
60 lines
3.2 KiB
YAML
plaintiff:
|
||
- CHENG KWOK WAH（鄭國華）
|
||
- LAI AH LOI（黎亞來）
|
||
- LIU FAT HOI（廖發開）
|
||
- HO CHING HOI（何清海）
|
||
- HSU CHE CHEONG（徐志中）
|
||
defendant:
|
||
- LI HING CLEANING SERVICES CO. LIMITED（利興清潔服務有限公司）
|
||
jurisdiction_code: HKLAT
|
||
jurisdiction_name: Labour Tribunal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
||
case_location:
|
||
- 香港特別行政區
|
||
- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
|
||
case_reason: >-
|
||
Plaintiffs claim severance payments from defendant, with the application for review being rejected.
|
||
case_object:
|
||
- severance payments
|
||
judgment_result:
|
||
- charge: The five Claimants’ claims under item (A) for severance payments (liability issue)
|
||
result: "Allowed. The Defendant shall pay forthwith: HK$13,412.05 to the 3rd Claimant, HK$3,003.42 to\
|
||
\ the 4th Claimant, HK$21,848 to the 7th Claimant, HK$13,827.86 to the 9th Claimant, and HK$13,826.82\
|
||
\ to the 11th Claimant."
|
||
- charge: The five Claimants’ claims under the second item for terminal payments (liability issue)
|
||
result: Dismissed.
|
||
- charge: "The Defendant shall pay forthwith costs of: HK$197 to the 3rd Claimant, HK$1,020 to the 4th\
|
||
\ Claimant, HK$180 to the 7th Claimant, HK$290 to the 9th Claimant, and HK$199 to the 11th Claimant\
|
||
\ (liability issue)"
|
||
result: Allowed.
|
||
- charge: Interest on the above judgment sums shall be calculated in accordance with section 39(3) of
|
||
the Labour Tribunal Ordinance (Cap 25) and be paid by the Defendant (quantum issue)
|
||
result: Allowed. Interest will be calculated as per the relevant provisions.
|
||
- charge: The Defendant’s application for review (liability issue)
|
||
result: Rejected. The Defendant failed to put forward any additional grounds in support of the application
|
||
for review.
|
||
- charge: The Defendant’s application for a stay of payment-out to the five Claimants of the sum of HK$67,996.81
|
||
(liability issue)
|
||
result: Dismissed. The application was deemed unjustified due to the temporal impact on the senescent
|
||
claimants and other relevant factors.
|
||
judgment_summary: >-
|
||
In this case involving severance payments, the Labour Tribunal ruled in favor of five plaintiffs (鄭國華,
|
||
黎亞來, 廖發開, 何清海, 徐志中) against defendant 利興清潔服務有限公司. The tribunal allowed claims for severance payments
|
||
and awarded specific amounts to each plaintiff, also granted costs to the plaintiffs. The application
|
||
for review was rejected as the defendant failed to present new grounds. Additionally, the defendant's
|
||
request for a stay of payment was dismissed due to the impact on senescent claimants.
|
||
involved_entities:
|
||
- entity_name: Ms. Michelle Lam
|
||
reason: Presiding Officer in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: CHENG KWOK WAH（鄭國華）
|
||
reason: 3rd Claimant in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: LAI AH LOI（黎亞來）
|
||
reason: 4th Claimant in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: LIU FAT HOI（廖發開）
|
||
reason: 7th Claimant in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: HO CHING HOI（何清海）
|
||
reason: 9th Claimant in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: HSU CHE CHEONG（徐志中）
|
||
reason: 11th Claimant in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: LI HING CLEANING SERVICES CO. LIMITED（利興清潔服務有限公司）
|
||
reason: Defendant in the case.
|