50 lines
2.7 KiB
YAML
50 lines
2.7 KiB
YAML
plaintiff: []
|
||
defendant:
|
||
- Linde HKO Limited
|
||
- Tse Chun Wah
|
||
- Linde GmbH
|
||
jurisdiction_code: HKCT
|
||
jurisdiction_name: 香港特別行政區競爭事務審裁處
|
||
case_location:
|
||
- 香港特別行政區
|
||
case_reason: >-
|
||
The Competition Commission seeks orders for the Respondents to make general discovery of documents,虽
|
||
case_object:
|
||
- documents
|
||
judgment_result:
|
||
- charge: Application for discovery and production of documents (liability issue)
|
||
result: Declined. The application was not properly formulated as a consequence of which the Tribunal
|
||
declined to make an order for the Respondents to make discovery at this time.
|
||
judgment_summary: >-
|
||
本案涉及香港特别行政区竞争事务审裁处（以下简称“审裁处”）对林德HKO有限公司、Tse Chun Wah及林德 GmbH提起的反垄断调查申请。申请人要求被申请人提供一般性文件，但未能按照规定程序提出正式申请。审裁处认为，根据《竞争事务审裁处规则》第24条的规定，所有临时性的申请，包括发现和生产文件，必须通过提交形式2的诉状进行。由于申请人未按规定提交诉状，且其在提交材料中假设一般性文件交换是惯例的做法，这与法律规定不符，因此审裁处驳回了申请人的请求。
|
||
involved_entities:
|
||
- entity_name: Hon Harris J
|
||
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: Competition Commission
|
||
reason: Applicant in the enforcement action.
|
||
- entity_name: Linde HKO Limited
|
||
reason: 1st Respondent in the enforcement action.
|
||
- entity_name: TSE CHUN WAH
|
||
reason: 2nd Respondent in the enforcement action.
|
||
- entity_name: Linde GMBH
|
||
reason: 3rd Respondent in the enforcement action.
|
||
- entity_name: Jonathan Harris
|
||
reason: President of the Competition Tribunal, articulated procedural principles regarding discovery
|
||
and production of documents.
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Jin Pao SC
|
||
reason: Counsel representing the applicant (Competition Commission).
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Timothy Parker
|
||
reason: Barrister representing the applicant (Competition Commission).
|
||
- entity_name: Ms Eva Sit SC
|
||
reason: Counsel representing the 1st respondent (Linde HKO Limited).
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Joshua Chan
|
||
reason: Barrister representing the 1st respondent (Linde HKO Limited).
|
||
- entity_name: Mr Nigel Francis
|
||
reason: Counsel representing the 2nd respondent (TSE CHUN WAH).
|
||
- entity_name: Linklaters
|
||
reason: Law firm instructing Ms Eva Sit SC and Mr Joshua Chan for the 1st respondent.
|
||
- entity_name: YTL LLP
|
||
reason: Law firm instructing Mr Carter Chim for the 3rd respondent (Linde GMBH).
|
||
- entity_name: Eversheds Sutherland
|
||
reason: Law firm instructing Mr Jin Pao SC and Mr Timothy Parker for the applicant.
|