51 lines
2.6 KiB
YAML
51 lines
2.6 KiB
YAML
plaintiff:
|
||
- COMPETITION COMMISSION
|
||
defendant:
|
||
- KAM KWONG ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD
|
||
- GOLDFIELD N&W CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD
|
||
- PACIFIC VIEW ENGINEERING LTD
|
||
- CHAN KAM SHUI (陳金水)
|
||
- LAM PO WONG (林保旺)
|
||
jurisdiction_code: HKCT
|
||
jurisdiction_name: 香港特別行政區競爭事務審裁處
|
||
case_location:
|
||
- 香港特別行政區
|
||
case_reason: >-
|
||
The Commission petitions for penalties against Kam Kwong Engineering Company Ltd and other Responds,
|
||
case_object:
|
||
- penalties
|
||
judgment_result:
|
||
- charge: Declaration that the 3rd Respondent has contravened the First Conduct Rule (liability issue)
|
||
result: Allowed. The court agreed based on the facts not in dispute, declaring that the 3rd Respondent
|
||
has contravened the First Conduct Rule.
|
||
- charge: Declaration that the 5th Respondent was a person involved in the contravention of the First
|
||
Conduct Rule (liability issue)
|
||
result: Allowed. The court agreed based on the facts not in dispute, declaring that the 5th Respondent
|
||
was a person involved in the contravention of the First Conduct Rule.
|
||
- charge: Costs order for the 3rd and 5th Respondents (quantum issue)
|
||
result: Allowed. The court agreed that if these proceedings are disposed of summarily, an order should
|
||
be made that the 3rd and 5th Respondents pay the Commission’s costs.
|
||
judgment_summary: >-
|
||
In this case, the Competition Commission (原告) sought penalties against Kam Kwong Engineering Company
|
||
Ltd and others for alleged contraventions of the First Conduct Rule under Hong Kong's competition laws.
|
||
The core issues revolved around whether the third and fifth respondents had breached the rule,1
|
||
involved_entities:
|
||
- entity_name: COMPETITION COMMISSION
|
||
reason: Applicant in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: KAM KWONG ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD (金光工程有限公司)
|
||
reason: 1st Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: GOLDFIELD N&W CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD (聯合金輝建築工程有限公司)
|
||
reason: 2nd Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: PACIFIC VIEW ENGINEERING LTD (豪景工程有限公司)
|
||
reason: 3rd Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: CHAN KAM SHUI (陳金水)
|
||
reason: 4th Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: LAM PO WONG (林保旺)
|
||
reason: 5th Respondent in the case.
|
||
- entity_name: Hon Harris J in Chambers
|
||
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
|
||
- entity_name: G Lam J (as he then was)
|
||
reason: Judge who issued judgment on 29 April 2020 in CTEA 2/2017, cited in paragraph 34 of this judgment.
|
||
- entity_name: HKHA’s DCS
|
||
reason: Management authority of the Decoration Contractor System under the Hong Kong Housing Authority.
|