hklii_samples/en_cases_hkdc/2013_HKDC_1253/summary-fast.yml

49 lines
2.6 KiB
YAML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters!

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters that may be confused with others in your current locale. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to highlight these characters.

plaintiff:
- HKSAR
defendant:
- GAO Huachang
- GAO Shixin
- CAI Jingxiang
jurisdiction_code: HKCA
jurisdiction_name: 香港特別行政區高等法院上訴法庭
case_location:
- 香港特別行政區
case_reason: >-
Defendants, having illegally entered Hong Kong, were jointly charged with theft and illegal remain,罪
case_object:
- Incense Tree
judgment_result:
- charge: Theft charge (liability issue)
result: Allowed. The court considered the appropriate starting point for the theft charge to be 3.5
years imprisonment, with a reduction of 1/3 due to pleas and further reductions based on mitigating
factors.
- charge: Theft charge (quantum issue)
result: Enhanced by 25%. The court considered the nature and extent of harm caused to the community
and enhanced the sentence accordingly. The final sentences are 38 months for D1 and D3, and 33 months
for D2.
- charge: Illegal remaining in Hong Kong (liability issue)
result: Allowed. The court referred to the tariff in So Man-king [1989] 1 HKLR 142 and sentenced each
defendant to 15 months imprisonment for their respective illegal remaining charge.
- charge: Total sentence (quantum issue)
result: The sentences were ordered to be served consecutively. D1 and D3 have a total of 38 months,
while D2 has a total of 33 months imprisonment.
judgment_summary: >-
本案涉及被告GAO Huachang、GAO Shixin及CAI Jingxiang非法入境香港并盗窃Incense Tree一案。法院审理了盗窃罪和非法滞留罪的核心争议认为三名被告共同策划盗伐濒危植物性质恶劣且数量较大判处GAO
Huachang和GAO Shixin各38个月监禁CAI Jingxiang33个月监禁。对于盗窃罪法院以3.5年为起点并考虑认罪等因素减刑25%最终确定GAO Huachang和GAO Shixin的刑期分别为35个月CAI
Jingxiang为30个月。非法滞留罪方面依据So Man-king案判例判处各15个月监禁。综合考量后法院决定将
involved_entities:
- entity_name: Deputy District Judge A. Yim
reason: Presiding judge in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
- entity_name: Miss Sheroy Tam, SPP, of the Department of Justice
reason: Counsel representing HKSAR.
- entity_name: Mr Kam Yee Wai Andrew, of Messrs. Kam & Fan, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid
reason: Counsel representing all Defendants.
- entity_name: HKSAR
reason: Government department involved in the prosecution.
- entity_name: GAO Huachang (D1)
reason: Defendant in the case.
- entity_name: GAO Shixin (D2)
reason: Defendant in the case.
- entity_name: CAI Jingxiang (D3)
reason: Defendant in the case.