hklii_samples/en_cases_hklat/2012_HKLaT_2/summary-fast.yml

48 lines
2.8 KiB
YAML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters!

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters that may be confused with others in your current locale. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to highlight these characters.

plaintiff:
- CHENG KWOK WAH鄭國華
- LAI AH LOI黎亞來
- LIU FAT HOI廖發開
- HO CHING HOI何清海
- HSU CHE CHEONG徐志中
defendant:
- LI HING CLEANING SERVICES CO. LIMITED利興清潔服務有限公司
jurisdiction_code: HKLAT
jurisdiction_name: 香港特別行政區勞資審裁處
case_location:
- 香港特別行政區
case_reason: >-
The five claimants, including Cheng Kwok Wah, claim severance payments or terminal payments from the
case_object:
- severance payments
- terminal payments
judgment_result:
- charge: Defendant's liability for severance payments (liability issue)
result: Allowed. The court found that the Defendant cannot avoid liability for severance payments as
the Claimants did not indicate they would switch to another company and were awaiting specific arrangements
from the Defendant.
- charge: Severance payment quantum (quantum issue)
result: Allowed. The Defendant is ordered to pay severance payments of HK$13,412.05 to the 3rd Claimant,
HK$3,003.42 to the 4th Claimant, HK$21,848 to the 7th Claimant, HK$13,827.86 to the 9th Claimant,
and HK$13,826.82 to the 11th Claimant.
- charge: Claimants' claims for terminal payments (liability issue)
result: Dismissed. The court dismissed the claims for terminal payments as severance payments were allowed.
judgment_summary: >-
本案涉及郑国华等五名原告与利兴清洁服务有限公司之间的雇佣关系终止及补偿金争议。原告主张被告应支付遣散费或终止协议金理由是被告未续签劳动合同且单方面变更工作时间构成严重违约。法院经审理认为被告未能证明原告自愿离职或因其他原因主动辞职因此判决支持了原告关于遣散费的诉求并确定具体金额分别为郑国华13,412.05港元、黎亚来3,003.42港元、廖发开21,848港元、何清海13,827.86港元及徐志中13,826.82港元。法院还指出,鉴于原告有权因被告违约而终止合同,故驳回了关于终止协议金的诉求。
involved_entities:
- entity_name: Ms. Michelle Lam
reason: Presiding Officer in this case, responsible for fact-finding and adjudication.
- entity_name: FEHD (Food and Environmental Hygiene Department)
reason: Management authority that entered into contracts with the Defendant for street cleaning services.
- entity_name: Li Hing Cleaning Services Co. Ltd
reason: Defendant in this case, providing cleaning services to FEHD.
- entity_name: Cheng Kwok Wah鄭國華
reason: 3rd Claimant in the case.
- entity_name: Lai Ah Loi黎亞來
reason: 4th Claimant in the case.
- entity_name: Liu Fat Hoi廖發開
reason: 7th Claimant in the case.
- entity_name: Ho Ching Hoi何清海
reason: 9th Claimant in the case.
- entity_name: Hsu Che Cheong徐志中
reason: 11th Claimant in the case.