33 lines
1.9 KiB
YAML
33 lines
1.9 KiB
YAML
plaintiff:
|
||
- Securities and Futures Commission
|
||
defendant:
|
||
- C.L. Management Services Limited
|
||
- AU Suet-ming, Clarea
|
||
jurisdiction_code: HKCA
|
||
jurisdiction_name: 香港特別行政區高等法院上訴法庭
|
||
case_location:
|
||
- 香港特別行政區
|
||
case_reason: "Securities and Futures Commission claims against C.L. Management Services Limited and AU\
|
||
\ Suet-ming, "
|
||
case_object:
|
||
- unlicensed business operation
|
||
- aiding and abetting
|
||
judgment_result:
|
||
- charge: Michael's involvement in the case (liability issue)
|
||
result: Disallowed. The court found that Michael’s testimony was not credible due to his self-incrimination
|
||
risk and the prosecution’s lack of proper handling.
|
||
judgment_summary: >-
|
||
本案涉及香港证券及期货事务监察委员会（原告）对C.L.管理服务有限公司及其代表AU Suet-ming, Clarea的指控，包括未获许可进行受监管活动以及协助和教唆。法院分析了相关法律条款，并引用了Hin
|
||
Lin Yee v HKSAR [2010] 13 HKCFAR 142及Kulemesin Yuriy & Tang Dock Wah v HKSAR [FACC 6 and 7 of 2012]的判例，认为涉及监管事务的罪行应被视为绝对责任。法院指出，鉴于此类罪行的社会影响较小且立法意图在于确保尽职行为而非证明故意或过失，因此不应要求证明被告方具有主观过错。最终判决C.L.管理服务公司
|
||
involved_entities:
|
||
- entity_name: Securities and Futures Commission
|
||
reason: Plaintiff in the case, responsible for prosecuting C.L. Management Services Limited and AU Suet-ming,
|
||
Clarea.
|
||
- entity_name: C.L. Management Services Limited
|
||
reason: Defendant 1 in the case, accused of carrying on a business in a regulated activity without a
|
||
license.
|
||
- entity_name: AU Suet-ming, Clarea
|
||
reason: Defendant 2 in the case, accused of aiding and abetting D1's offenses.
|
||
- entity_name: Magistrate June Cheung
|
||
reason: Presiding judge at the Eastern Magistrates Court during the trial.
|